Where the money peaks
Revenue peaks exactly where elasticity is 1. Profit peaks somewhere else entirely — and that gap is where most pricing mistakes live.
How much do they care? left one number unexplained. On our demand curve, elasticity hits exactly 1.00 at a price of $30 — and at that price, adding a dollar moves revenue by essentially nothing.
That is not a coincidence. It is the definition, seen from the other side.
Why revenue peaks at elasticity 1
Every price rise does two things at once, and elasticity is the exchange rate between them:
- Elasticity below 1. You lose proportionally fewer customers than the price gains. Revenue rises. Keep going.
- Elasticity above 1. You lose proportionally more customers than the price gains. Revenue falls. Come back.
- Elasticity exactly 1. The two effects are the same size. Revenue has stopped changing — which is what being at the top means.
So the revenue peak is not a place you find by guessing prices. It is the one price where a customer's willingness to leave exactly balances your gain from those who stay.
Now put the costs back
Revenue is not the goal, and a company optimising it is optimising the wrong thing. Each of our units costs $10 to make, so what we actually keep is:
Two hills, from the same curve. Drag the price across both — and then drag the cost.
The revenue hill and the profit hill are not the same hill
- Units sold
- 60
- Revenue
- $1,800
- Profit
- $1,200
- Elasticity here
- 1.00
Set the cost back to $10 and compare the two candidate prices:
| Price | Units | Revenue | Profit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $30 | 60 | $1,800 | $1,200 | the best revenue |
| $35 | 50 | $1,750 | $1,250 | the best profit |
$30
- Units
- 60
- Revenue
- $1,800
- Profit
- $1,200
- the best revenue
$35
- Units
- 50
- Revenue
- $1,750
- Profit
- $1,250
- the best profit
Every one of those ten lost customers was paying $30 for something that cost $10, so each was worth having. Losing them is still right, because the other fifty are now paying $5 more each. Fifty times $5 is $250; ten times $20 is $200.
The general result, worth remembering: cost pushes the best price up. On this curve the profit peak sits at $30 plus half the unit cost — drag the cost slider to $20 and watch the coral summit settle at $40. A company that prices off revenue is systematically too cheap, and the more expensive its product is to make, the more too-cheap it is.
The same answer, counted one unit at a time
There is a second route to $35 that needs no curve at all — just What does one more cost?'s question, asked repeatedly. To sell one more unit you must shade the price for everyone, so the extra revenue from unit number n is less than its price. Each unit costs $10 to make. Make it while the extra revenue beats the extra $10.
| Units | Price needed | Total revenue | Extra revenue from this unit | vs $10 cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | $36.00 | $1,728 | — | |
| 49 | $35.50 | $1,739.50 | $11.50 | make it |
| 50 | $35.00 | $1,750 | $10.50 | make it |
| 51 | $34.50 | $1,759.50 | $9.50 | stop |
| 52 | $34.00 | $1,768 | $8.50 | stop |
48
- Price needed
- $36.00
- Total revenue
- $1,728
- Extra revenue from this unit
- —
- vs $10 cost
49
- Price needed
- $35.50
- Total revenue
- $1,739.50
- Extra revenue from this unit
- $11.50
- vs $10 cost
- make it
50
- Price needed
- $35.00
- Total revenue
- $1,750
- Extra revenue from this unit
- $10.50
- vs $10 cost
- make it
51
- Price needed
- $34.50
- Total revenue
- $1,759.50
- Extra revenue from this unit
- $9.50
- vs $10 cost
- stop
52
- Price needed
- $34.00
- Total revenue
- $1,768
- Extra revenue from this unit
- $8.50
- vs $10 cost
- stop
Stop where the extra revenue meets the extra cost, and you land on exactly the price the profit hill picked. Two methods, no calculus, same answer — which is the point: the peak of a curve and the marginal rule are the same statement.
What to take into the case
| Idea | In one line |
|---|---|
| Revenue peaks at elasticity 1 | above it, price rises cost you revenue; below it, they earn it |
| Profit peaks above the revenue peak | by half the unit cost, on this curve |
| Never optimise revenue | the revenue-maximising price is a known, predictable mistake |
| Margin decides, not volume | ten lost customers can be cheaper than the discount that would keep them |
Revenue peaks at elasticity 1
- In one line
- above it, price rises cost you revenue; below it, they earn it
Profit peaks above the revenue peak
- In one line
- by half the unit cost, on this curve
Never optimise revenue
- In one line
- the revenue-maximising price is a known, predictable mistake
Margin decides, not volume
- In one line
- ten lost customers can be cheaper than the discount that would keep them
You now have every tool the last session needs: marginal cost, opportunity cost, diminishing returns, elasticity, and the gap between revenue and profit. Time to use all five at once.

